Procees Review

PEER REVIEW POLICY

Peer Review Process

• The journal implements double-blind peer review, where the identities of authors and reviewers are kept confidential.
• Each manuscript will be reviewed by at least two independent reviewers who have expertise in the related field.
• Reviewers are given 2-4 weeks to complete the review process.
• The final decision regarding acceptance or rejection of the article is up to the editor based on the reviewer's recommendation.

Review Criteria

Reviewers will assess the manuscript based on:

• Originality and novelty of the research.
• Relevance to the scope of the journal.
• Quality of methodology and data analysis.
• Quality of writing and clarity of presentation.
• Compliance with publication ethics standards.

Transparency and Fairness in Peer Review

• The journal is committed to ensuring that the entire peer review process is transparent and fair.
• If there is a conflict of interest, the reviewer must disclose it to the editor and refuse to review the manuscript.
• The author has the right to appeal the decision if they have strong reasons and are supported by clear evidence.

Handling Ethical Deviations in Peer Review

• If ethical violations are found in the review process, the journal has the right to take action, including replacing the reviewer or conducting a re-review.
• All cases of ethical violations will be handled in accordance with the COPE guidelines.