Remote Sensing of Mangrove Health and Vulnerability in Tolongano

Authors

  • Herlangga Adiputra Master of Agricultural Science Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Tadulako University , Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Adam Malik Master of Agricultural Science Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Tadulako University , Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Bau Toknok Master of Agricultural Science Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Tadulako University , Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Hamzari Master of Agricultural Science Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Tadulako University , Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia
  • Abdul Rosyid Master of Agricultural Science Study Program, Postgraduate Program, Tadulako University , Palu, Central Sulawesi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55173/agriscience.v10i1.206

Keywords:

mangrove forests, vegetation health, vulnerability, remote sensing, SAVI, weighted overlay.

Abstract

Mangrove ecosystems play an important role in protecting coastal areas from erosion, waves, and other environmental disturbances. However, increasing anthropogenic pressures, including aquaculture expansion, settlement development, and land-use conversion, threaten their sustainability. Previous studies have commonly assessed mangrove health or vulnerability separately, providing limited insight into the relationship between ecosystem condition and potential threats. This study addresses this gap by integrating the Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) to evaluate mangrove health, spatial vulnerability, and their relationship in Tolongano Village, South Banawa Sub-district, Central Sulawesi. The integration of SAVI and MCDA offers a novel framework for identifying healthy mangrove areas that remain exposed to significant anthropogenic pressures.Using Landsat 8/9 imagery, land-use data, and field validation at 45 sampling points, mangrove health was classified into healthy (72.78 ha; 52.47%), moderate (32.82 ha; 23.66%), and unhealthy/degraded (33.11 ha; 23.87%) categories. Classification accuracy was high, with an Overall Accuracy of 97.78% and a Kappa coefficient of 0.98. Vulnerability analysis showed that 87.40% of the mangrove area was categorized as very highly vulnerable, mainly due to the proximity of aquaculture ponds. Correlation analysis produced a weak negative relationship (r = −0.2390) between mangrove health and vulnerability. The results indicate that healthy mangrove stands may still face substantial future threats. The SAVI–MCDA approach provides a practical tool for conservation prioritization, coastal spatial planning, and long-term mangrove management.

References

Ayan, B. B., Erden, T., & Karaman, H. (2023). Analysis of equal-weighted overlay methods in spatial decision support systems. Environmental Earth Sciences, 82(4), Article 112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-023-10789-w

Duke, N. C., Mackenzie, J. R., Canning, A. D., Hutley, L. B., Bourke, A. J., Kovacs, J. M., Cormier, R., Staben, G., Lymburner, L., & Ai, E. (2022). ENSO-driven extreme oscillations in mean sea level destabilise critical shoreline mangroves—An emerging threat. Plos Climate, 1(8), e0000037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000037

Gauthey, A., Backes, D., Balland, J., Alam, I., Maher, D. T., Cernusak, L. A., Duke, N. C., Medlyn, B. E., Tissue, D. T., & Choat, B. (2022). The Role of Hydraulic Failure in a Massive Mangrove Die-Off Event. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.822136

Giri, C., Ochieng, E., Tieszen, L. L., Zhu, Z., Singh, A., Loveland, T., Masek, J., & Duke, N. (2011). Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 20(1), 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00584.x

Goldberg, L., Lagomasino, D., Thomas, N., & Fatoyinbo, T. (2020). Global mangrove distribution, dynamics, and drivers of change. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 244, Article 106901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2020.106901

Hamzah, F., Setiawan, A., & Utama, R. (2025). Coastal dynamics and mangrove degradation risks in Central Sulawesi. Marine Environmental Research, 204, Article 106118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106118

Hickey, S., Radford, B., Callow, N., Phinn, S., Duarte, C. M., & Lovelock, C. E. (2021). ENSO feedback drives variations in dieback at a marginal mangrove site. Scientific Reports, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87341-5

Hawari, M. H. A. (2025). Modelling vegetation density using the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI) methods on Landsat 8 imagery (Unpublished master's thesis). Universitas Gadjah Mada.

Macreadie, P. I., Costa, M. D. P., Atwood, T. B., Friess, D. A., Kelleway, J. J., Kennedy, H., Lovelock, C. E., Serrano, O., & Duarte, C. M. (2021). Blue carbon as a natural climate solution. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 2(12), 826–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-021-00224-1 Cited by: 1146

Mappiasse, M. F., Djafar, M., & Asra, R. (2022). Distribution of mangrove health in the coastal area of Maros Regency in 2021 based on Sentinel-2 satellite imagery. Wallacea Forestry Research Journal, 11(2), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.18330/jwallacea.2022.vol11iss2pp165-179

Mukaka, M. M. (2012). Statistics corner: A guide to the appropriate use of the correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Medical Journal, 24(3), 69–71.

Novianti, R., Prasetyo, S. Y. J., & Sukamto, A. (2024). Remote sensing classification accuracy models using confusion matrix implementations. Indonesian Journal of Geospatial Technology, 11(1), 34–45.

Partama, I. G., Sukojo, B. M., & Handayani, H. H. (2024). Multi-criteria decision analysis for coastal vulnerability mapping using weighted overlay techniques. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 12(5), Article 789. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12050789

Proisy, C., Anthony, E. J., Fromard, F., Gardiner, C., & Gratiot, N. (2018). Remote sensing of mangrove evolution in dynamic intertidal environments. Remote Sensing, 10(9), Article 1432. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10091432

Putri, A., Rahmawan, H., & Ramadhan, T. (2025). Spatial distribution patterns and carbon sink valuation of mangrove ecosystems in Central Sulawesi. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 197(2), Article 88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-13411-9

Richards, D. R., & Friess, D. A. (2016). Rates and drivers of mangrove deforestation in Southeast Asia, 2000–2012. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(2), 344–349. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510272113

Sabta, M., Iskandar, Z., & Wijaya, K. (2024). Microclimate regulation and patterns of human interference in mangrove reserves. Forest Ecology and Management, 552, Article 111125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.111125

Saintilan, N., Lymburner, L., Wen, L., Haigh, I. D., Ai, E., Kelleway, J. J., Rogers, K., Pham, T. D., & Lucas, R. (2022). The lunar nodal cycle controls mangrove canopy cover on the Australian continent. Science Advances, 8(37). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abo6602

Schaduw, J. N. W., Boneka, F. B., & Ompi, M. (2024). Physiological conditions and canopy health indexing of intertidal forests. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 199, Article 115127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2023.115127

Simarmata, N., Siregar, V. P., & Agus, S. B. (2021). Reduction of substrate background noise using a modified soil-adjusted vegetation index. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 22, Article 100512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100512

Vasquez, J., Acevedo-Barrios, R., & Martinez-Asis, L. (2024). Landsat 9 radiometric enhancements for structural assessment of dynamic coastal vegetation. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 62, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2024.3359012

Downloads

Published

2026-07-28

How to Cite

Remote Sensing of Mangrove Health and Vulnerability in Tolongano. (2026). Agricultural Science, 10(1), 33-43. https://doi.org/10.55173/agriscience.v10i1.206